In search of the most effective Home windows i9 laptops of 2023? Apart from the machine’s options, it’s the CPU you must drastically think about. Fortunately, Intel provides boatloads of i9 cellular processor fashions, however which of them are thought-about the most effective by right now’s requirements? Moreover on the lookout for a better core rely and sooner clock velocity, contemplating benchmark scores of CPUs can information you in deciding on the appropriate Home windows i9 laptop computer to your wants.
Benchmarking Intel Core i9 CPUs
Actual-world benchmarking is undeniably higher than artificial one because it provides you with the precise knowledge of the CPU efficiency in particular apps and packages. Nevertheless, on this overview, we are going to deal with evaluating the general power of i9 CPUs, which might information you in choosing the right Home windows i9 laptops that may deal with varied duties.
There’s a bunch of benchmarking instruments that can be utilized for artificial benchmarking. Be aware, nonetheless, that counting on totally different knowledge from these a number of instruments is really useful as some CPUs stand out at sure CPU benchmark checks. Thus, evaluating totally different artificial benchmarking scores will higher show you how to validate the efficiency of the CPU. And whereas these benchmarking instruments have their very own scoring programs, keep in mind that excessive scores imply excessive efficiency in CPUs.
Selecting i9 CPU fashions
Though Intel already provides the Thirteenth era of its i9 processors referred to as Raptor Lake, there are additionally different earlier i9 fashions value contemplating, particularly if you’ll examine their worth, efficiency, and worth to these of the most recent fashions. As such, except for the lately launched fashions from the upper era processors, we listed one earlier Intel Core i9 mannequin that also holds nice worth.
On this overview, we listed benchmark scores plotted on varied benchmarking platforms that use totally different instruments within the take a look at course of. And for knowledge uniformity, we noticed consistency when it comes to the actual instruments and platforms we listed right here.
With all that, listed here are the benchmark scores of those Core i9 fashions alongside the most effective Home windows laptops that possess them.
CPU Benchmarks and Greatest Home windows i9 laptops
Core i9-12950HX
This processor was launched in Might 2022 and falls beneath the Alder Lake-HX line and the twelfth era of Core i9. The chip comes with 16 cores (24 threads) and 55 watts of base energy (most turbo energy of as much as 157W). Its efficiency and effectivity cores possess 2.3 GHz and 1.7 GHz base frequencies, respectively, whereas their most turbo frequencies come at 5.0 GHz and three.6 GHz, respectively. Though Core i9-12950HX is just like Core i9-12900HX, its vPro administration platform eligibility helps it stand out. With all this stuff and cheap threaded efficiency, it may be an honest chip for gaming. Listed here are a few of Core i9-12950HX’s newest benchmark scores:
PassMark
PerformanceTest V10: 3, 878 (Single Thread Ranking), 32, 757 (Common CPU Mark)
Integer Math: 112,392 MOps/Sec
Floating Level Math: 82,667 MOps/Sec
Discover Prime Numbers: 143 Million Primes/Sec
Random String Sorting: 43 Thousand Strings/Sec
Knowledge Encryption: 22,034 MBytes/Sec
Knowledge Compression: 370.6 MBytes/Sec
Physics: 2,187 Frames/Sec
Prolonged Directions: 22,616 Million Matrices/Sec
Single Thread: 3,878 MOps/Sec
NanoReview
Cinebench R23: 1,991 (Single-Core), 23,191 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5: 1,904 (Single-Core), 16,233 (Multi-Core)
Passmark CPU: 3,863 (Single-Core), 32,633 (Multi-Core)
UserBenchmark
Common Bench: 107%
LaptopMedia
Cinebench R23: 23,395 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20: 7,159 (Multi-Core)
Notebookcheck
Cinebench R23: 1,906 (Single-Core), 23,113 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 CPU: 741 (Single-Core), 8,777 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15: 276 (CPU Single 64 Bit), 3,530 (CPU Multi 64 Bit)
7-Zip 18.03: 6,318 MIPS (Single Thread 4 runs), 85,019 MIPS (Multi Thread 4 runs)
HWBOT x265 V2.2 4k Preset: 26.5 fps
Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU: 337 seconds
Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU: 193 seconds
R Benchmark 2.5: 0.4515 sec
3DM11 Efficiency Physics: 23,711
3DMark Ice Storm Physics: 99,481
3DMark Cloud Gate Physics: 22,793
3DMark Hearth Strike Normal Physics: 34,733
3DMark Time Spy CPU: 14,615
Geekbench 5.1 – 5.4 64 Bit: 1,924 (Single-Core), 16,009 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit: 1,855 (Single-Core), 14,728 (Multi-Core)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: 506 ms
Octane V2: 94,008
WebXPRT 4: 286
WebXPRT 3: 324
CrossMark: 2,112
WHAT LAPTOPS USE CORE I9-12950HX?
Core i9-12950HX is extensively obtainable, and there are a very good variety of laptop computer fashions that now make the most of this chip. Two of the most effective ones presently providing Core i9-12950HX are the Lenovo ThinkPad P16 and Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE.
ThinkPad P16. ThinkPad P16, which incorporates the Core i9-12950HX, is the successor of ThinkPad P15 and P17. With a 2.95kg weight and dimensions of 14.3 x 10.5 x 1.2 inches, P16 is a big laptop computer thought-about a desktop substitute or a cellular workstation. Nevertheless, in contrast to Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE, P16 just isn’t particularly designed for gaming regardless of possessing the Core i9-12950HX, which ought to make the lower for such a objective, as PassMark famous. So what’s it for? As a substitute of gaming, this P16 with excessive efficiency {hardware} will probably be ideally suited for professionals that want heavy-duty laptops for specialised duties, equivalent to 3D design, CGI rendering, knowledge evaluation, machine studying, or 4K video enhancing. The mannequin can deal with such heavy duties, however pushing the CPU and GPU to the restrict means shorter hours from its 94Wh battery. But, based on XDA’s take a look at utilizing PCMark 10’s Trendy Workplace rundown take a look at, P16 lasted 7 hours operating customary productiveness work beneath Greatest Efficiency mode. This implies choosing a decrease mode can result in longer battery hours.
Furthermore, P16 is stuffed with high-end options, together with a superb keyboard, as much as OLED UHD+ with 100% DCI-P3 colour, as much as an NVIDIA RTX A5500 laptop computer GPU, and extra. It additionally has loads of ports, together with two Thunderbolt 4, USB-C 3.2 (Gen 2), two USB-A 3.2 (Gen 1), HDMI, 3.5mm audio, an SD card reader, and a Nano-SIM slot (elective). There are additionally choices for 4G LTE and NFC elective.
In the meantime, the position of Core i9-12950HX in P16 is supported with an honest cooling system by way of the 2 massive followers partnered with warmth pipes and spreaders, which labored successfully in balancing the temperature even throughout an Intel Turbo burst take a look at. And to offer you extra thought of how Core i9-12950HX performs in P16, listed here are some benchmark scores (by way of XDA):
Geekbench 5: 1,836 / 15,464
CPU-Z: 791.3 / 9,308
7-Zip: 105.3 GIPS / 121.8 GIPS
Cinebench R23: 1,868 / 19,410
Corona 1.3: 71 seconds
PCMark 10: 6,782
CrossMark: 1,879
3DMark Time Spy: 10,410
3DMark Hearth Strike: 26,213
CrystalDiskMark (MB/s): 6,967 (learn) / 5,124 (write)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE. This mannequin using Core i9-12950HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti GPU is designed for gaming. There’s additionally an RTX 3070Ti variant, but it surely doesn’t have a vapor chamber cooling system, which you’d actually admire. It’s thought-about a high-end gaming laptop computer with the mentioned GPU and CPU (and a quick 240-Hz show), which suggests it may price rather a lot. But, it’s able to delivering nice gaming efficiency. On the draw back, it may be a bit limiting for productive workplace duties, particularly because it lacks a webcam, although you would be supplied an exterior webcam (ROG Eye S). Does it make ROG Strix Scar 17 SE much less engaging? No. Nevertheless it stresses Asus’ goal for this mannequin: to be a devoted gaming unit.
With the mixture of Core i9-12950HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti on this mannequin, all kinds of video games and works will be dealt with effectively. It’s also customary with a thick rubberized grip beneath, RGB lighting within the ROG emblem, and an “invisible ink” print seen beneath UV gentle, which additional underscores its design as a gaming mannequin. ROG Strix Scar 17 SE additionally comes with two USB-A 3.2 gen1, a USB-C with Thunderbolt 4, a USB-C gen2 with video and knowledge, an HDMI 2.1, LAN, and headphone and mic ports.
When it comes to efficiency, the GPU and CPU can ship pleasing work, particularly with a 1,590 MHz increase clock and 170W max graphics energy from the previous, providing you with dependable body charges at 1080p and native 2560 x 1440 decision. Throughout the benchmark take a look at of Tom’s {Hardware} to Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE utilizing totally different video games, the mannequin carried out at 144fps at 1080p and 91fps at 1440p in Grand Theft Auto V (Very Excessive setting), 125 fps at 1080p and 113 fps at 1440p in Far Cry New Daybreak (Extremely), 85 fps at 1080p and 61 fps at 1440p in Purple Lifeless Redemption 2 (Medium), 119 fps at 1080p and 83 fps at 1440p in Shadow of the Tomb Raider (Highest), and 109fps at 1080p and 79fps at 1440p in Borderlands 3 (Badass).
Core i9-13980HX
This flagship Thirteenth-generation cellular CPU mannequin is beneath Raptor Lake-HX and is devoted to gaming laptops. The arrival of Core i9-13980HX, which boasts a 5.6GHz turbo frequency, alerts the primary 24-core configuration help in a laptop computer CPU. Intel itself described Core i9-13980HX because the “world’s quickest cellular processor” when it was launched in January. Specifically, the corporate claimed it may present as much as 11% sooner single-thread efficiency and as much as 49% sooner multitasking efficiency in comparison with its twelfth gen siblings.
The 55W chip has eight efficiency cores and 16 effectivity cores, which might result in very excessive multi-thread efficiency. Furthermore, it provides help for DDR4 and DDR5 reminiscence, PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, as much as 5.6 gigahertz (GHz) turbo frequency, 32 threads, 128 gigabyte RAM, and Thunderbolt 4 with switch speeds as much as 40 gigabits per second. Its base clock frequency is 2200 MHz, however it may attain as much as 5600 MHz because of Turbo Increase know-how.
In keeping with PassMark, the chip “has nice single threaded efficiency that may serve nicely in video games” and could possibly be thought-about “a excessive finish chip that will be nice for gaming” when paired with a very good video card. Listed here are the benchmark scores of Core i9-13980HX.
PassMark
PerformanceTest V10: 4,400 (Single Thread Ranking), 49, 223 (Common CPU Mark)
Integer Math: 177,236 MOps/Sec
Floating Level Math: 126,291 MOps/Sec
Discover Prime Numbers: 202 Million Primes/Sec
Random String Sorting: 73 Thousand Strings/Sec
Knowledge Encryption: 38,045 MBytes/Sec
Knowledge Compression: 615.8 MBytes/Sec
Physics: 2,492 Frames/Sec
Prolonged Directions: 36,108 Million Matrices/Sec
Single Thread: 4,400 MOps/Sec
NanoReview
Cinebench R23: 2, 140 (Single-Core), 30, 769 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5: 2,098 (Single-Core), 20, 300 (Multi-Core)
UserBenchmark
Common Bench: 117%
LaptopMedia
Cinebench R23: 30,796 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20: 11,789 (Multi-Core)
Notebookcheck
Cinebench R23: 2,169 (Single-Core), 33,052 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 CPU: 825 (Single-Core), 12,437 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15: 312 (CPU Single 64 Bit), 5,172 (CPU Multi 64 Bit)
Cinebench R11.5 CPU 64 Bit: 3.7 (Single), 55.8 (Multi)
Cinebench R10 Rend 32 Bit: 11,940 (Single), 85,088 (Multi)
Cinebench R10 Rend 64 Bit: 17,400 (Single), 125,983 (Multi)
wPrime 2.0 1024m: 183.5 s
wPrime 2.0 32m: 3 s
WinRAR 4.0: 11,438 factors
7-Zip 18.03: 7,084 MIPS (Single Thread 4 runs), 125,720 MIPS (Multi Thread 4 runs)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0: 374 fps (Go 1), 198.1 fps (x264 Go 2)
HWBOT x265 V2.2 4k Preset: 33.4 fps
TrueCrypt Serpent: 2.5 GB/s
TrueCrypt Twofish: 4.9 GB/s
TrueCrypt AES: 18.4 GB/s
Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU: 201 seconds
Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU: 112 seconds
R Benchmark 2.5: 0.4008 sec
3DMark 06 – CPU: 19,734
Tremendous Pi mod 1.5 XS: 7.4 s (1M), 15.5 s (2M), 345.8 s (32M)
3DM11 Efficiency Physics: 26,524
3DMark Ice Storm Physics: 96,956
3DMark Ice Storm Excessive Physics: 91,414
3DMark Ice Storm Limitless Physics: 94,552
3DMark Cloud Gate Physics: 24,650
3DMark Hearth Strike Normal Physics: 41,205
3DMark Time Spy CPU: 15,908
Geekbench 5.1 – 5.4 64 Bit: 2,139 (Single-Core), 20,847 (Multi-Core)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: 460 ms
WebXPRT 4: 318
WebXPRT 3: 344
CrossMark: 2,182
WHAT LAPTOPS USE CORE I9-13980HX?
Regardless of being new to the market, there are already laptops utilizing Core i9-13980HX. The highest participant on this part is Asus, which now provides the ROG Strix Scar 18.
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18. This mannequin is one other gaming laptop computer filled with highly effective {hardware}. Apart from the Intel Core i9-13980HX CPU, it offers you the choice for GeForce RTX 4080 12GB or Nvidia’s prime cellular GPU this yr, the RTX 4090 16GB. Its physique dimension (1.21 x 15.71 x 11.57 inches) and three kilos of weight make it a quite big unit, however its highest-end cellular {hardware} and general efficiency justify all the pieces. These items embrace the massive 18-inch anti-glare display screen boasting a 2,560 x 1,600 decision with a 240Hz refresh price.
As a gaming laptop computer, you possibly can count on totally different game-related parts on the physique of Strix Scar 18. It additionally has RGB lighting throughout the keyboard. The draw back of this mannequin, nonetheless, is the plastic materials used on a lot of its exterior components and the shortage of touchscreen functionality of the display screen, making its repute as a “high-end” laptop computer a bit questionable for some. On a optimistic notice, in comparison with ROG Strix Scar 17 SE, Strix Scar 18 has a digicam regardless of being designed as a gaming laptop computer.
In keeping with PCMag, the cooling system of Strix Scar 18 works effectively, stopping you from feeling the warmth from most of its components. The draw back about this, nonetheless, is a quite loud fan sound when the machine is put beneath heavy actions and gaming.
On a optimistic notice, the Asus Strix Scar 18, generally (due to its highly effective set of {hardware} parts), can ace totally different checks. In PCMag’s productiveness take a look at utilizing PCMark 10, it scored 9,129. In the meantime, the laptop computer’s Core i9-13980HX processor scored 28,713 in Cinebench R23 and 20,402 in Geekbench. Below the opposite checks, ROG Strix Scar 18 hit 20,283 factors in 3DMark Time Spy, 73,509 in 3DMark Evening Raid, 505 in GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins, and 901 in Automotive Chase. Listed here are extra benchmarks from Notebookcheck to enhance these figures:
PCMark 10: 8,764
3DMark 06 Normal Rating: 67702 factors
3DMark 11 Efficiency: 46985 factors
3DMark Ice Storm Normal Rating: 277937 factors
3DMark Cloud Gate Normal Rating: 70984 factors
3DMark Hearth Strike Rating: 36408 factors
3DMark Hearth Strike Excessive Rating: 24278 factors
3DMark Time Spy Rating: 20166 factors
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit: 24410
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit: 25072 Factors
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit: 11940
Cinebench R10 Rendering A number of CPUs 32Bit: 85088
Cinebench R10 Rendering A number of CPUs 64Bit: 125983 Factors
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit: 17400 Factors
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit: 55.79 Factors
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit: 3.73 Factors
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit: 204.24 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit: 312 Factors
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit: 99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit: 322 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit: 4781 Factors
Alternatively, PCMag shared that Strix Scar 18 managed to achieve as much as 173fps with DLSS activated when utilized in F1 2021, 159fps at 1080p (Extremely) in Murderer’s Creed Valhalla, and 390fps at 1080p (Extremely) in Rainbow Six Siege. Alternatively, its built-in show’s native 2,560 x 1,600 decision delivered 164fps in F1 2022 with DLSS activated, 116fps in Murderer’s Creed: Valhalla beneath Extremely, and 422fps in Rainbow Six Siege additionally in Extremely. Tom’s {Hardware}, in the meantime, reported that the machine carried out at 181 fps at 1080p and 124 fps at its native 2560 x 1600 in Shadow of the Tomb Raider (Highest setting) and 152 fps at 1080p and 132 fps at 2560 x 1600 in Grand Theft Auto V (Very Excessive setting). In Cyberpunk 2077, the laptop computer reportedly reached 40fps with DLSS off when its native decision was employed beneath Extremely preset, based on PCMag, who additionally mentioned seeing it bump to 84.3fps beneath Auto and 131fps with DLSS 3’s body era know-how activated.
MSI Titan GT77 HX. If you would like the closest rival of the Asus ROG Strix Scar 18, think about MSI Titan GT77 HX, which additionally makes use of Intel Core i9-13980HX and Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 graphics card. Regardless of this, it has few vital benefits over Strix Scar 18. As an example, within the checks carried out by PCMag, Titan GT77 HX scored a number of extra factors than the opposite.
In PCMag’s HandBrake 1.4 take a look at, the MSI laptop computer managed to transform a 12-minute video clip from 4K to 1080p decision seconds sooner (3:28) than ROG Strix Scar 18, which did for 3:35. Titan GT77 HX additionally gained a number of factors greater than its rival in different benchmark checks together with in Geekbench (20,513 versus 20,402), Time Spy (20,422 versus 20,283), and GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins (530 versus 505). Listed here are extra benchmark scores of MSI Titan GT77 HX and Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 carried out by Laptop computer Magazine:
MSI Titan GT77 HX:
Geekbench 5.4: 2,073 (Single-Core), 20,617 (Multi-Core)
3DMark Hearth Strike: 33,620
3DMark Time Spy: 19,726
3DMark Hearth Strike Extremely: 14,031
3DMark Time Spy Excessive: 10,807
3DMark Port Royal (Ray Tracing): 13,975
25GB file copy disk velocity take a look at: 2,299.3 MBps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18
Geekbench 5.4: 2,066 (Single-Core), 19,233 (Multi-Core)
3DMark Hearth Strike: 33,138
3DMark Time Spy: 18,327
3DMark Hearth Strike Extremely: 12,655
3DMark Time Spy Excessive: 9,513
3DMark Port Royal (Ray Tracing): 12,345
25GB file copy disk velocity take a look at: 1,885.8 MBps
When it comes to gaming, Titan GT77 HX also can ship a significantly better visible expertise because of its 4K providing, although a better setting apparently means fewer frames per second. As an example, it reached 128 fps at 1080p and 48 fps at native 4K (versus Strix Scar 18’s 123 fps at 1080p and 86 fps at 1600p) in Purple Lifeless Redemption’s Medium setting, 177 fps at 1080p and 71 fps at 4K (versus 165 fps at 1080p and 112 fps at 2560 x 1600) in Borderlands 3’s Badass setting, 180fps at 1080p and 70 fps at 4K (versus 181 fps at 1080p and 124 fps at 2560 x 1600) in Shadow of the Tomb Raider’s Highest setting, 176 fps at 1080p and 50 fps at 4K (versus 152 fps at 1080p and 132 fps at 2560 x 1600) in Grand Theft Auto V’s Very Excessive setting.
Greatest 2023 Home windows i9 laptops: Are they value shopping for?
Selecting a laptop computer ought to at all times be primarily based in your wants, and following it will make sure you’ll get the most effective out of your cash. Step one to do it’s to know the way the CPU is designed for a selected Home windows laptop computer. As an example, Core i9-12950HX is being utilized by ThinkPad P16 and Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE, however these laptops have totally different basic functions. Whereas P16 is taken into account a cellular workstation, Strix Scar 17 SE is devoted to avid gamers. That’s due to the opposite parts built-in into the unit (e.g., GPU) and the way the laptops are constructed and designed generally.
Alternatively, having the identical GPU and CPU fashions doesn’t imply equal efficiency in two totally different laptops. Take Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 and MSI Titan GT77 HX as examples. Each use Intel Core i9-13980HX and Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090, however there are nonetheless a number of variations of their performances, as confirmed in varied benchmarks above. That’s due to every laptop computer’s different distinctive parts and specs, such because the 4K decision of Titan GT77 HX. That mentioned, contemplating different issues past the CPU and GPU will lead you to the appropriate selection.
Supply hyperlink